BPP: Raise a Query

Self-service support journey

 

OVERVIEW

As part of the wider BPP mobile app experience, I worked on designing a “Raise a Query” flow aimed at helping students quickly access support for issues related to finance, accounts, and general administration.

The goal was to reduce friction in the support journey by encouraging self-service first, while still allowing students to submit a query when needed.


THE PROBLEM

Students often struggled to:

  • Know where to go for support

  • Find the correct contact point for different issues

  • Access relevant help content quickly

  • Track existing support requests

At the same time, support teams were receiving large volumes of repetitive queries that could potentially be resolved through clearer guidance or self-service support.

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Students needed a simpler and more guided way to resolve support issues without relying entirely on manual support channels.


RESEARCH & INSIGHTS

Research and support analysis revealed several recurring behaviours:

  • Students often raised support tickets before attempting self-service

  • Many queries were repetitive and related to existing help centre content

  • Students lacked confidence in whether they were selecting the correct support category

  • Duplicate queries created operational inefficiencies for support teams

These insights shaped the direction of a more guided and intelligent query-raising experience.

CONTINUOUS INSIGHT & ITERATION

The query flow also became a valuable source of behavioural insight. By regularly monitoring the most common support requests submitted through the form, we were able to identify recurring student pain points and areas of confusion across the wider BPP experience.

This data helped inform:

  • future product priorities

  • improvements to help centre content

  • chatbot training opportunities

  • UX improvements across related journeys

  • operational focus areas for support teams

The query data created an ongoing feedback loop, allowing us to continuously refine the experience based on real student behaviours and needs.


DESIGN GOALS

The experience was designed to:

  • Encourage self-service before escalation

  • Reduce duplicate or unnecessary support tickets

  • Help students navigate support categories more confidently

  • Provide reassurance throughout the journey

  • Maintain a clear escalation path if self-service failed

THE SOLUTION

I designed a multi-step support flow that progressively guided students through the query journey.

Key Features

  • Course and programme selection to personalise support options

  • Query categorisation and sub-categories

  • Contextual help centre nudges throughout the flow

  • Confirmation prompts after viewing support articles

  • Duplicate query detection for existing open tickets

  • File upload support for evidence/documents

  • Success and error handling states

The experience aimed to balance usability with operational efficiency by encouraging self-service before escalation.

Figma prototype

KEY LEARNINGS

One of the biggest learnings from the project was that we had made it too easy for students to raise support tickets.

While the experience reduced friction, it also increased support demand and encouraged users to bypass self-service content.

This became an important product insight:

removing friction entirely can unintentionally increase operational load.

EVOLUTION OF THE EXPERIENCE

As the platform evolved, BPP introduced an AI chatbot capable of answering many common student questions instantly.

The support journey shifted to:

  1. Chatbot-first support

  2. Self-service guidance

  3. Escalation to “Raise a Query” only when needed

This created a more scalable support model while still maintaining a strong student experience.


REFLECTION

This project strengthened my understanding of:

  • service design and operational UX

  • balancing user needs with business efficiency

  • intelligent escalation patterns

  • designing self-service experiences at scale

It also reinforced that good UX is not always about removing every barrier — sometimes it’s about guiding users toward the right outcome.